Bearing destruction due to lack of lubrication
I would like to know the typical destruction scenario of a bearing
(ball, approx 2 in., no trust) having lack of lubrication (almost no
lubrication at all). For example, inner ring is rotating (fit on the
shaft), outer race is fit in the casing, no rotation. RPM = 3600
1- How much time it can roll without lubrication before catastrophic failure ?
2- What are temperatures it could reach on inner ring ?
3- Is outer race damaged or not ? (the one we are investigating is almost in perfect shape)
4- If you have typical visual references for this type of bearing failure, it would be good for comparison.
We are investigating bearing failure, we try to justify first hypothesis which is lack of lubrication.
In the wake of many hurricanes, we read testimonials about how
so-and-so's outboard motor ran for many hours on straight gasoline
because no lube oil was available, and at the end of that ordeal, the
engine either:
- finally seized, or
- was undamaged, or
- was rebuildable, or
- was replaced with a new one by the mfgr.
Regardless
of the variant, the story always has a happy ending, because outboards
are built with ball, needle and roller bearings, all of which can
survive operation with just a whisper of lube oil.
I suggest that
you ask the manufacturer of your specific failed bearings for
help. They have the resources, and some incentive to figure out what
caused the failure, or at least what didn't.
Research lube oil mist. A ball bearing can survive on drops of oil per day. And there are documented cases of entire units with many machines running for hours with no lube oil mist delivered with no failures. In an outboard motor, the bearings are still lubricated by gasoline. Gasoline is not a great lubricant, but it does provide some lubrication. When I get back to work, I have some better information on the results of a failure from lack of lube.
The last bearing failure that I saw that I believe was a result of a
complete lack of lubrication happened just a few days ago. I believe
that the oil ring came out of the groove in the adapter and stopped
spinning. The failure appears to have started with the cage. This makes
some sense. The contact between the balls and races is rolling contact.
The contact with the cage is always sliding contact. This was a double
row bearing acting as a radial bearing in a between-bearings pump. The
stamped steel cage failed and one section was pulled between a ball and
race. That cage broke up into individual sections. The other cage
popped out, almost intact. The balls then slumped to one side without
the cage to support them. The inner race eventually popped off to the
side opposite the balls resulting in an extreme misalignment. The inner
race was almost melted down on one side. The balls had been ground into
the inner race. One ball actually broke in half. The outer race was
almost perfect. With the shaft making this outrageous orbit, the forces
transmitted across to the steam turbine driver caused it to fail. The
radial bearing in the turbine was wiped out with the worse damage on the
top. The vibration on the turbine was so extreme that all six hold-down
bolts came loose and the shims came out from under the feet. At first,
we were not sure if the turbine failed first and took out the pump or
the other way around. But, when we examined the failed parts, it became
clear that the pump was the start of the failure.
This failure
demonstrates why we don't like stamped steel cages. Our preferred
thrust bearing is a pair of back-to-back single row bearings with
machined bronze cages. Our preferred radial bearing is a deep groove,
single row bearing with a riveted steel cage. The double row bearing is
a bad idea since it cannot be made with anything but a stamped steel
cage (unless it has a split inner race). We converted the pump to a
single row bearing of the same size and modified the adapter to
accommodate the narrower bearing. The modern version of the same model
pump is built with the single row bearing, so we had good confidence
that it could take the imposed load. We also redesigned the oil ring to
make it more stable with a higher or lower oil level. We considered
extending the flange on the end of the adapter to make it harder for the
oil ring to jump out of the groove. But, in the end, we stayed with
the same adapter.
I have seen this same sort of failure
before. The damage has tended to be worse on the inner race. Even with a
back-to-back pair of bearings, the inner race can become almost molten,
rolling up over the lock-washer and nut.
MORE NEWS